Reality Skill | Founding Reality Lab, Minsk
Founding Reality Lab • Minsk

More information does not automatically create more clarity.

Reality Skill is the trainable ability to understand where you are, choose meaningful direction, separate signal from noise, make decisions under uncertainty, and update your model quickly when reality does not match your expectations.

Minsk6–8 people12 weeksWeekly
The problem

Our most expensive mistakes rarely begin with a lack of information.

More often, we misread the situation, confuse interpretation with fact, spend attention on the wrong things, or defend a model long after reality has changed.

01

Information overload

Data, opinions, news and AI answers exceed our ability to process them well. What matters gets buried in what is available.

02

Outdated models

We keep navigating with maps that once worked even after the territory itself has changed.

03

Decisions on partial information

Life rarely waits for perfect data. Consequential choices must be made inside uncertainty.

04

Anxiety without agency

Without separating control, influence and environment, we spend mental energy on problems we cannot meaningfully change.

Reality Skill

Not a correct worldview. A system that knows how to update one.

We treat working with reality as a practice: orient, choose direction, manage attention, understand agency, decide, observe feedback, and adapt.

01

Orientation

Where am I? What is fact versus story?

02

Direction

What is actually worth pursuing?

03

Attention

What is signal and what can be ignored?

04

Agency

What do I control, influence, or simply face?

05

Decision

What hypothesis and next move are best now?

06

Adaptation

What changed, and how fast should I update?

Founding Cohort

Reality Lab is not a course with finished answers.

It is a 12-week laboratory in Minsk where a small group tests strong tools against real decisions and co-builds a practical operating system for navigating today's reality.

Personal Reality OS v1.0 for every participant
Collective Reality Protocol v1.0 for the group
Every tool earns Keep / Modify / Discard
Weekly practice

90 minutes each week: short feedback loops instead of occasional inspiring conversations.

Real decisions

Business, money, relationships, health, risk, goals and personal choices, not classroom cases.

Human + Group + AI

Think independently first, use the group second, then use AI as a red team rather than an oracle.

The group improves itself

After every session we update the protocol based on what created insight and what created noise.

12 weeks

Build the Reality OS on ourselves, not on a whiteboard.

Every module gets applied immediately to real situations. We keep only what survives contact with practice.

Weeks 1–2

Reality

Where am I? Fact vs interpretation. Uncertainty. What assumptions are already embedded in my map?

Weeks 3–4

Direction

Who am I, what do I want and why? Goals, priorities, opportunity cost and direction.

Weeks 5–6

Information

Signal/noise, sources, incentives, base rates, information diet and when to stop collecting.

Weeks 7–8

Decision

Hypotheses, probabilities, premortem, reversibility, decision journals and agency.

Weeks 9–10

Systems & Adaptation

Feedback loops, delays, constraints, leverage points and signs that a model is becoming obsolete.

Weeks 11–12

Recovery & OS v1.0

How to fail cheaply, avoid sunk-cost traps and assemble a personal operating system for reality.

Working loop

Observe → Model → Decide → Update

01 / OBSERVE

Observe

Separate data from interpretation. Identify signal and unknowns.

02 / MODEL

Model

Build a simple explanation, alternatives and causal relationships.

03 / DECIDE

Decide

Record probability, criteria and the best next experiment.

04 / UPDATE

Update

Review outcomes and change the model without defending ego or sunk cost.

Less helplessness

Not every uncertainty deserves the same amount of your attention.

A core Reality Skill practice is to classify consequential questions by agency before trying to solve them. It does not remove uncertainty. It turns uncertainty into a structure for action.

Control
I can do this directly.

Turn thinking into an action, experiment or choice.

Influence
I cannot control the outcome, but I can change its probability.

Identify leverage and an appropriate level of effort.

Environment
I can barely change this.

Stop arguing with reality. Treat it as an input and build scenarios around it.

Outcome

Not interesting conversations. A better way to work with your life.

After 12 weeks, each participant should leave with a compact system they continue using long after the founding cohort ends.

See situations more clearly

Separate observation from the story you are telling yourself.

Choose better goals

Connect decisions to who you are, where you are and where you actually want to go.

Filter information

Reduce information load and protect attention for what matters.

Decide under uncertainty

Use hypotheses, probabilities, base rates and small testable steps.

Spend less anxiety on the uncontrollable

Separate control, influence and environment.

Recover faster

Notice earlier when the plan is failing and change course before the error gets expensive.

Who it is for

We do not need identical people. We need a good room.

Entrepreneurs, leaders, builders, technical specialists and thoughtful professionals with different mental models, provided they can challenge an idea without turning disagreement into a fight.

Probably yes, if you…

make consequential decisions with incomplete information
can say “I don't know” and update your mind
want to use ideas rather than collect frameworks
are willing to bring real questions and real stakes
value intellectual disagreement and confidentiality

Probably not, if you…

want networking or a place to sell services
want the room to validate a position you've already chosen
prefer analyzing everyone else's mistakes
cannot commit to a regular 12-week rhythm
expect a finished system to simply be handed to you
Intellectual foundations

Use tools from many schools. Turn none of them into dogma.

Systems thinking, Theory of Constraints, forecasting, premortem, lateral thinking and other lenses are useful only if they improve how we navigate real situations.

Donella MeadowsSystems thinking, feedback loops, delays and leverage points.
Eliyahu GoldrattConstraints, inherent simplicity and causal reasoning.
Edward de BonoLateral thinking, deliberate perspective switching and Serious Creativity.
Philip TetlockForecasting, calibration, probability and track records.
Gary KleinPremortem and surfacing failure modes before mistakes get expensive.
Ken Wilber / AQALA useful lens for checking which perspective we may be missing.
Spiral DynamicsA lens on differing value systems and developmental frames.
Andrey KurpatovConstructors, centrists and reflectors as a language for cognitive diversity.
Minsk Founding Reality Lab

If this idea maps to a real problem in your life, let's talk.

The first cohort will be intentionally small and cognitively diverse. The goal is not to fill eight seats at any cost. It is to assemble people who make the room smarter.

Minsk12 weeks6–8 participants

Contact:
Platon Belmont
clickpulsar@gmail.com

Your name
How should we contact you?
Your work, projects or current focus
Specific examples help us evaluate fit
Why do you want to test this practice?
Experience, thinking style, expertise or perspective
Apply
In Bricks, replace this visual form mockup with the native Form element from application-form-en-bricks.json. It is preconfigured to email Platon Belmont and save the submission in Bricks Form Submissions.